M.C. Mehta v. Union Of India (Uoi), (SC) BS187009
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- M.B. Shah, Brijesh Kumar and D.M. Dharmadhikari, JJ.

I.A.NOS.163-165 IN WP (C) 13381 of 1984. D/d. 19.03.2002.

M.C. Mehta - Petitioner

Versus

Union of India - Respondent

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32 - Taj Mahal - Protection of - Brick kiln - Permission to operate - Report submitted by Joint Inspection Committee considered and brick kiln owners permitted to operate temporarily their brick kilns on a specific condition that they would comply with the recommendations made by the said Committee within the stipulated time - If any of the recommendations are not complied, held, they would not only be liable to be punished in accordance with law but their licence to run brick kiln would be cancelled permanently - Direction to close down the said brick kiln or to relocate the same to some other place would be given if it was found that any of the brick kilns were situated within 20 km of the radial distance from significant monuments.

[Paras 3, 4, 6 and 7]

ORDER

M.B. Shah, J. - Agra Slaughter house matter List after 15 days.

2. Personal presence of the Secretary, Ministry of Environment for the time being is dispensed with. IAs Nos. 302, 304-05

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Considering the report dated 11.3.2002 submitted by the Joint Inspection Committee and observations made therein the following brick kiln-owners are permitted to operate temporarily their brick kilns on a specific condition that they would comply with the recommendations made by the Joint Inspection Committee within two weeks from today :

4. The following applicant brick kilns may be permitted to operate after compliance with the provisions of Recommendation 3 and the provisions of the notification dated 14.9.1999 under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, regarding use of fly ash :

5. Based on Observation 18, the following brick kilns may not be allowed to operate beyond three seasons even after compliance with the provisions mentioned under recommendation 3 :

6. On failure to comply with any of the recommendations, they would not only be liable to be punished in accordance with law but their licence to run brick kiln would be cancelled permanently.

7. Learned Additional Solicitor General submits that with regard to the radial distance, the Surveyor General of India would submit his report with regard to the distance of brick kilns from the significant monuments within four weeks from today. (SIC) finally it is found that any of the brick (SIC) in/s is/are within 20 km of the radial distance then they would be directed to (SIC) se down the said brick kiln/s and/or to locate at some other place. With regard (SIC) the distance of Kasimpur Thermal Power (SIC)ition also necessary radial distance of brick kilns would be stated, if necessary, with the assistance of ISRO.

8. Stand over for four weeks.

9. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. With regard to the following 19 industries :

(S. No. 21).

10. Adjourned for four weeks.

11. With regard to these IAs the Joint Inspection Committee to submit its report within three weeks.

12. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. It has been pointed out in the affidavit that the applicant industries are located in no-gas-zone area and, therefore, gas cannot be supplied to the applicant industries. It is also pointed out that if the applicants shift their industries in a gas-zone area, gas would be immediately supplied. In this view of the matter, these applications are rejected. Agra Heritage Fund matter

13. Taken on board. List after two weeks.

14. Remaining matters on board adjourned for four weeks.

.