Licensed To:
7 judgements found. Displaying from 1 to 7.
| Search within Results | Eliminate from Results |

1. Devineni Avinash v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (SC) 25.02.2025.

- Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438 Anticipatory Bail - Allegations of political violence and destruction of property - FIR registered in 2021 - Petitioners apprehending arrest after mo

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

2. M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, (SC) 21.02.2025.

- Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 168-A Notifications issued under Section 168-A of the GST Act - Challenge to the legality, validity, and propriety of Notification Nos. 9 and 56 of 2023 - Issue pertains to wheth

Cited 2 times Read Headnote

3. Sandeep Jain v. IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited, (SC) 21.02.2025.

- National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Judgment upheld - Appeal dismissed - Supreme Court found no error in the view taken by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

4. M/s. Naresh Kumar Gupta v. State of Punjab, (SC) 20.02.2025.

- A. Taxation - Value Added Tax Act, 2007 - Entry 28 Part B Schedule II - Cell phones and their parts taxed at 5% excluding phones with MRP exceeding Rs. 10,000 - High Court's judgment upheld distinguishing Nokia India Pr

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

5. Kayyum Abdul Shaikh @ Abdul Kayyum Badulla Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra, (SC) 17.02.2025.

- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Section 13 (1)(b), Section 43 (D)(5) Bail - Appellant accused of being involved in unlawful activities as an office bearer o

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

6. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 v. Nya International, (SC) 17.02.2025.

- A. Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 263 Jurisdiction of Commissioner of Income Tax - Exercise of jurisdiction under Section 263 requires the finding that the reassessment order is both erroneous

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

7. State of Himachal Pradesh v. Surajmani, (SC) 06.02.2025.

- A. Employment Law - Daily-wage workers - Conferral of "work-charged" status - Workers completing 8 years of continuous service entitled to "work-charged" status - Relief limited to notional benefits as explained in prio

Cited 5 times Read Headnote