See labeled Judgment
Modal title
51. Union of India v. Doly Loyi (SC) 24.09.2024. - A. Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972, Rule 9(6)(b)(i) - Whether by the mere grant of prosecution sanction, it could be said that the prosecution for a criminal charge is pending against the respondent GovernmenCited 2 times Read Headnote
- A. Central Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1972, Rule 9(6)(b)(i) - Whether by the mere grant of prosecution sanction, it could be said that the prosecution for a criminal charge is pending against the respondent Governmen
Cited 2 times Read Headnote
52. Commissioner of Customs (Imports) Mumbai v. Ircon International Ltd., (SC) 24.09.2024. - Civil Appeals - Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. Ircon International Ltd. - Supreme Court held that it is not inclined to interfere in the matter, taking into account the facts and the status of the parties Read Headnote
- Civil Appeals - Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. Ircon International Ltd. - Supreme Court held that it is not inclined to interfere in the matter, taking into account the facts and the status of the parties
Read Headnote
53. Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal v. Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil (SC) 24.09.2024. - A. Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Section 4 - Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Sections 4 , 33 , 34 and Cited 2 times Read Headnote
- A. Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Section 4 - Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Sections 4 , 33 , 34 and
54. HMT Ltd. v. Smt. Rukmini (SC) 24.09.2024. - A. Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, Section 7 (1) - Rental compensation and return of unacquired land - Dismissal of writ petition on ground of delay and laches of 46 Cited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, Section 7 (1) - Rental compensation and return of unacquired land - Dismissal of writ petition on ground of delay and laches of 46
Cited 1 times Read Headnote
55. Vishal Tiwari v. State of Punjab, (SC) 24.09.2024. - Special Leave Petition - Supreme Court of India - Petition seeking leave to appeal against High Court orders - Court held that after perusing the material on record and hearing the petitioner's counsel, no interference Cited 1 times Read Headnote
- Special Leave Petition - Supreme Court of India - Petition seeking leave to appeal against High Court orders - Court held that after perusing the material on record and hearing the petitioner's counsel, no interference
56. Sheikh Nizamuddin Mohd. Kasim v. Intelligence Officer, (SC) 24.09.2024. - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 8(c) read with Sections 21(c), 23(c), 28, 29 - Customs Act, Section 135A - Bail application - Petitioner in custody for over 5 years - Trial still pending - Suprem Read Headnote
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Section 8(c) read with Sections 21(c), 23(c), 28, 29 - Customs Act, Section 135A - Bail application - Petitioner in custody for over 5 years - Trial still pending - Suprem
57. Vijay Veer Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (SC) 24.09.2024. - A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Sections 138 and 142 Dishonour of cheque - Cause of action for the complainant to maintain a complaint arises when there is no p Read Headnote
- A. Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Sections 138 and 142 Dishonour of cheque - Cause of action for the complainant to maintain a complaint arises when there is no p
58. Dinesh Goyal @ Pappu v. Suman Agarwal (Bindal) (SC) 24.09.2024. - A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6 , Rule 17 - Partition - Amendment of Plaint - Suit filed seeking share in property on the ground that it belonged to her fathCited 11 times Read Headnote
- A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6 , Rule 17 - Partition - Amendment of Plaint - Suit filed seeking share in property on the ground that it belonged to her fath
Cited 11 times Read Headnote
59. Tarun Chugh, CEO and Managing Director, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd. v. Saroj Kumar Panda (SC) 23.09.2024. - A. Labour and Employment Law - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Proper Impleadment of Parties - Held, it is mandatory to implead the correct employer in industrial disputes. Impleading individual officers of a company doe Read Headnote
- A. Labour and Employment Law - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Proper Impleadment of Parties - Held, it is mandatory to implead the correct employer in industrial disputes. Impleading individual officers of a company doe
60. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Weedo Ventures Pvt. Ltd., (SC) 23.09.2024. - Income Tax Law Special Leave Petition challenging tax liability of Rs. 1,50,000/- - Court observed that for such a petty amount, it was unnecessary for the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court - Delay of 477 days in Read Headnote
- Income Tax Law Special Leave Petition challenging tax liability of Rs. 1,50,000/- - Court observed that for such a petty amount, it was unnecessary for the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court - Delay of 477 days in