See labeled Judgment
Modal title
1. Sahil Firoz Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra, (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Criminal Procedure Bail Grant - Appellant aged 18 years - No antecedents except one non-cognizable offence - No recovery from appellant - Interim bail order made absolute considering peculCited 3 times Read Headnote
- A. Criminal Procedure Bail Grant - Appellant aged 18 years - No antecedents except one non-cognizable offence - No recovery from appellant - Interim bail order made absolute considering pecul
Cited 3 times Read Headnote
2. Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi v. State of Karnataka (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 417 , 376 and 306 - Cheating and abetment ofCited 22 times Read Headnote
- A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 417 , 376 and 306 - Cheating and abetment of
Cited 22 times Read Headnote
3. Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar v. Monika (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 14 , 15 , 16 , Cited 7 times Read Headnote
- A. Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 14 , 15 , 16 ,
Cited 7 times Read Headnote
4. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Jaipur Development Authority, (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10(20) - Assessee not claiming benefit under Section 10(20) - High Court granting benefit under the said provision - Held, High Co Read Headnote
- A. Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10(20) - Assessee not claiming benefit under Section 10(20) - High Court granting benefit under the said provision - Held, High Co
Read Headnote
5. Income Tax Officer v. Vinal Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., (SC) - 29.11.2024. - Income Tax Act - Special Leave Petition - Revenue's petitions disposed of as the issue was already covered by the Supreme Court's judgment in "Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal" (202 Read Headnote
- Income Tax Act - Special Leave Petition - Revenue's petitions disposed of as the issue was already covered by the Supreme Court's judgment in "Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal" (202
6. Mukesh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 Constitution of India Article 226 Petition for quashing criminal proceedings - Filing Cited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482 Constitution of India Article 226 Petition for quashing criminal proceedings - Filing
Cited 1 times Read Headnote
7. State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramkumar Choudhary (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 - Condonation of delay - Sufficient Cause - Discretion to condone the delay has to be exercised judiciously based on factCited 129 times Read Headnote
- A. Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 - Condonation of delay - Sufficient Cause - Discretion to condone the delay has to be exercised judiciously based on fact
Cited 129 times Read Headnote
8. Satish Kumar Ravi v. State of Jharkhand, (SC) - 29.11.2024. - A. Contempt of Court - Police officers filing charge sheet against accused despite court's order directing no coercive action - Reliance on internal police communication to justify such action -Cited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Contempt of Court - Police officers filing charge sheet against accused despite court's order directing no coercive action - Reliance on internal police communication to justify such action -
9. Common Cause v. Union of India, (SC) - 28.11.2024. - A. Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 8A Mining lease - Reduction in mining area and resumption of operations - Applicant directed to compCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 8A Mining lease - Reduction in mining area and resumption of operations - Applicant directed to comp
10. Dinesh Verma v. Income Tax Officer, (SC) - 28.11.2024. - Income Tax Act Special Leave Petition - Issue involved in the petition already covered by the prior Supreme Court judgment in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal - Held, assessing officers to dispCited 1 times Read Headnote
- Income Tax Act Special Leave Petition - Issue involved in the petition already covered by the prior Supreme Court judgment in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal - Held, assessing officers to disp