Licensed To:
250 judgements found. Displaying from 31 to 40.

31. C.I.T. Delhi v. Bharti Hexacom Ltd., (SC) 17.05.2024.

-

32. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 5 v. Trigent Software Limited, (SC) 17.05.2024.

- Constitution of India, Article 136

33. Govt. of NCT of Delhi Through Its Secretary, Land And Building Department v. M/s. K.L. Rathi Steels Limited, (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 114 , Order 42 Rule 1 - Review Petition - Scope - Three broad components which need to be satisfied to set the ball for a review in motion -

Cited 12 times Read Headnote

34. Delhi Development Authority v. Tejpal, (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Limitation Act, 1963 - Law of limitation explained - Law aids the vigilant and not those who sleep on their rights -

Cited 9 times Read Headnote

35. Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/s BSK Realtors LLP, (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Section 24 (2) - Res judicata - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - It was held in

Cited 7 times Read Headnote

36. Shaji Poulose v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Guidelines No.1 - CA(7)/02/2008 dated 08.08.2008 - Professional misconduct - Whether the Council of the Institute, under the 1949 Act, was competent to impose, by way of Guidelines, a

Read Headnote

37. The Employees State Insurance Corporation Ltd. v. Nagar Nigam Allahabad (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Sections 40 , 45A and 85B - Employees of Nagar Nigam not covered under Employees' State Insurance

Cited 1 times Read Headnote

38. Ravi Kumar v. State of Haryana, (SC) 17.05.2024.

-

Cited 1 times

39. Lucky Malik @ Bangali v. Akali Times Trust, (SC) 17.05.2024.

-

Cited 1 times

40. Sunita Devi v. State of Bihar (SC) 17.05.2024.

- A. Rule for Video Conferencing for Courts, 2020, Rules 6, 8 and 11 - Video Conferencing - It is only appropriate that the accused has to be produced before the Court, rather than marking his appearance through video conf

Cited 5 times Read Headnote

Goto Judgment