See labeled Judgment
Modal title
51. State (CBI) v. Mohd. Salim Zargar @ Fayaz, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15 - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987, Rule 15 - Confessions recorded by police officers - ProCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Section 15 - Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Rules, 1987, Rule 15 - Confessions recorded by police officers - Pro
Cited 1 times Read Headnote
52. Chandra Shekhar Singh v. State Of Jharkhand, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Sections 37 , 91 and 94 - Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011, Clause 2.1.3 - Recruitment eligibilCited 4 times Read Headnote
- A. Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Sections 37 , 91 and 94 - Food Safety and Standards Rules, 2011, Clause 2.1.3 - Recruitment eligibil
Cited 4 times Read Headnote
53. Vaibhav Goel v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 31 (1) Legal effect of approval of Resolution Plan - All dues, including statutory dues owed to the Central Government, State Government, or any Cited 5 times Read Headnote
- A. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 31 (1) Legal effect of approval of Resolution Plan - All dues, including statutory dues owed to the Central Government, State Government, or any
Cited 5 times Read Headnote
54. Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) v. Neetu Gaur, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 12 - Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) is an "Authority" - Whether ICSSR exercises 'deep and pervasive' control over Research in Rural anCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 12 - Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) is an "Authority" - Whether ICSSR exercises 'deep and pervasive' control over Research in Rural an
55. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Satendra, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 323 , 450 , 307 , 302 read with Section 34 AcquiCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 323 , 450 , 307 , 302 read with Section 34 Acqui
56. Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board v. Bhagwan Devi (Dead), (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34 and 37 - Arbitral Award - Agreement by statutory Board attempting to return part of land acquired through emineCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34 and 37 - Arbitral Award - Agreement by statutory Board attempting to return part of land acquired through emine
57. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Uttar Pradesh Cane (Gazetted) Service Rules, 1979 - Pension entitlement - Employees appointed under the "Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana" Scheme - Held, employees governed by the Uttar Pradesh Cane (Gazetted) Service Read Headnote
- A. Uttar Pradesh Cane (Gazetted) Service Rules, 1979 - Pension entitlement - Employees appointed under the "Antar Gramin Sadak Nirman Yojana" Scheme - Held, employees governed by the Uttar Pradesh Cane (Gazetted) Service
Read Headnote
58. Parsvnath Film City Ltd. v. Chandigarh Administration, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 and 37 Arbitral Tribunal's award - High Court set aside the award, deeming the appellant showed unwillingness to Cited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 and 37 Arbitral Tribunal's award - High Court set aside the award, deeming the appellant showed unwillingness to
59. M/s Citicorp Finance (India) Limited v. Snehasis Nanda, (SC) 20.03.2025. - A. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 2 (1)(d) Definition of 'consumer' - Held, complainant does not qualify as a 'consumer' under the Act due to absence of privity of contract with the appellCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 2 (1)(d) Definition of 'consumer' - Held, complainant does not qualify as a 'consumer' under the Act due to absence of privity of contract with the appell
60. Raju Naidu v. Chenmouga Sundra, (SC) 19.03.2025. - A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 148 Doctrine of Merger - Appellate Court decree supersedes Trial Court decree - Observed, once an appellate court modifies the decree of a trial court, thCited 1 times Read Headnote
- A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 148 Doctrine of Merger - Appellate Court decree supersedes Trial Court decree - Observed, once an appellate court modifies the decree of a trial court, th